I read an article on the WSJ about the Global Online Academy, which my school has
now become a member of. The article doesn’t debunk a trend in which researchers claim that elite private schools are resisting online learning (meaning the delivery
of online courses), but it does make a valid point that online coursework amoung
private schools is growing and GOA is an example.
GOA is non-profit, though there is a fee to take courses.
The fees pay for basic administration, and for teachers to develop and deliver
curriculum.
A little about GOA.
Students can work at their own pace, but there are deadlines
that must be met. The structure is collaborative in nature, with students
interacting with the teacher and each other. One teacher notes that there is
still “human interaction” but that it is mediated differently. For myself, I
enjoy online coursework, but I do prefer being in a room with people discussing
ideas, problems and solutions. I think the online programs that require
students to do on site training (such as during summers) the best of both worlds
is met. In the case of teaching this is possible due to longer breaks.
What I like about the online world is meeting people living
in all parts of the world. This point is made as a benefit of the program,
along with other “pros”, such as an expanded choice of courses and the fact
that classes are limited to 18 students. (so there can be meaningful
interaction, if all participants engage each other and build a relationship) Drawbacks
can be a lack of intimacy and spontaneity. (you’ll never have the situation in
which you’re in class and jazzed about the topic and choose to carry over in
the pub) I think the most important point, which can be said for any learning
environment, is that it doesn’t work for everyone. Some kids need the four-wall
structure and a teacher in the room. Online learning also benefits kids who are
sick in the hospital, home as a teenage parent, or one who needs an extra
course to finish school on time or early.
The article poses the question: Can it be avoided? I
personally doubt it. I’m not convinced that online learning is going to replace
traditional schools any time soon. There have been arguments that kids will
learn at home, and schools will be places for community building activities and
socialization, like fine arts and sporting activities. It’s possible, but not
soon.
The article also points out the opportunities to break down
cultural barriers. Yes, this is possible, but with any other form of media, it
can be used for cultural conflict as well. People have access to publicize delinquent,
and deliberately antagonizing material.
But all of that can be said for any kind of online learning
platform. I like the potential benefits that GOA provides for students and
teachers. For example, teachers who have to (or choose to) stay at home can
earn money through online teaching. Students can pick up extra coursework, and
possibly courses that are more attractive to their interests.
Perhaps I'm growing older, but didn't we have distance learning by paper just a decade and a half ago?
Source Article: Online Holdouts No More
Further reading: Elite Private Schools Unite to Offer Full-Credit Online Courses